Thursday, September 15, 2016

Launching Up Up and Away

Assignment #1: Attributes to consider for fixed wing UAV
“According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way that a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat little body off the ground. The bee, of course, flies anyways. Because bees don't care what humans think is impossible.”

Steering entirely away from the obvious science that makes flight possible, or the mechanics behind flight dynamics, and the whole avionics or auto-pilot package let’s focus on the mission, the comms and the payload.  UAV design teams also need to consider the following attributes such as
Takeoff – Will the UAV use a high energy launch system ie catapult, or vehicle mounted take off? How about Vertical Take Off and Landing (VOTL) but that’s not for Fixed Wing models.  In some cases, hand launching is possible though too unpredictable
Landing – Parachutes, Deep Stall (free falling drop from the sky!), Belly Landing (hard), Wheeled landing, Net Recovery, or high precision hook catch (Scan Eagle by Insitu)
Positioning of payload – The actual payload or delivery capability. Some experts would say that the most important consideration in designing the UAV _IS the payload, without the payload the UAV has no purpose [3]. Depending on the structure of the UAV and purpose of the payload and load balancing, possible positions could be belly mounted (for cameras or munitions) vs nose positioning.
Comms Path – more to follow.
 A Complete UAV package design would typically include [2]
  • The baseline aircraft be it fixed wing or rotary series
  • Optional manual control backup, by remote control link for collision avoidance
  • GCS system for remote monitoring the UAV in flight status, intervention
  • Onboard flight control

The communications link between UAV and GCS (ground control station) may theoretically be established by laser, fiber optics or radio but the RF- based communications is by far the most practical and widely used.  Comms link is required for sending flight control data and analysis back to the control station, and depending on the mission, sending the data logging and interaction with on board sensors. Navigation sensors provide measurement of the UAV inflight status. Mission oriented sensors complement the nav sensors, can provide real-time and first person view.
ITU and IEEE names the designated frequency bands for small-scale UAV comms operation to
L band 405-425 MHz, 915 MHz, and 1.35 to 1.39 GHz
S band 2.45 GHz, C band 5.8 GHz all in LOS

Signal modulation – the wide usage of frequency hopping, spread spectrum has made it highly unlikely to lose comms between a UAV and GCS from signal interference.   Spread spectrum is spreading the signal across the frequency spectrum and repeats the freq switching to minimize the chance of intercept or jamming.

Here is a really great example for a complete fixed wing UAV in operation, the Aerosonde.
Interesting facts about Aerosonde by AAI Corporation, a catapult-launched UAV with a typical takeoff weight 39 or 55. It lands by a net recovery catch or a soft belly landing in the snow.
It was initially designed to collect weather and atmospheric data over oceans, at a high altitude (over 5,500 ft) and endurance of over 10 hours. Example of other uses include missions by the US Navy and the US Special Operations Command.
In August 1998, it was the world’s first smallest aircraft to traverse the Atlantic Ocean, the first UAV for sure, launched from the roof of a moving car from Newfoundland, Canada and flew for over 26 hours to a small island off the coast of Scotland through stormy weather. Aerosondes have been known to fly through tropical storms since 2001. [1]


[2] G. Cai, J. Dias, L. Senevirantne, “A Survey of Small-Scale Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Recent Advances and Future Development Trends” Unmanned Systems, Vol 2, No 2 (2014) pg 1 – 25.
[3] H. Loewen (MicroPilot) - Expert Pointers for Better Fixed-Wing UAV Designs
https://www.micropilot.com/pdf/fixed-wing-uav-designs.pdf (Links to an external site.)

Friday, August 5, 2016

Aerial Delivery of Vaccine-Laced Treats for Wild Ferrets

This blogspace shall be used as a digital notebook/ sandbox to write up my assignments for an online course on small UAV. This is my own original writing and expressively my own opinion, with references hopefully correctly referenced.

Aerial Delivery of Vaccine-Laced Treats for Wild Ferrets

The US Fish and Wildlife Services have a strong case to begin using UAS (aka drones) to deliver the Prairie Dog Sylvatic Plague Vaccine (SPV) to protect the black-footed ferret population, possibly in September 2016.
As widely reported in newspapers, radio broadcasts and tweets around the world, drones will deliver M&M peanuts smeared with vaccine-laced peanut butter to the ferrets on the ground in their own natural habitat, specifically in the Charles M Russell National Wildlife Reserve, as well as thousands of acres of habitat from Canada to Mexico.  The key factors for choosing drones as the most efficient method of delivery is 1) the ability to cover a larger area in a shorter time ie: one vaccine dose per 9-10 meters at a rate of 50 doses per acre; whereas a human can cover only 3-6 acres per hour on foot or ATV. The projected speed of the UAS would fly at 9m/ second and cover an area of 60-200 acres in one hour.  Retrieved from https://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/UAS_2016_EA_final.pdf 2) low environmental impact or damage to ground vegetation and animals on the ground. UAS operators will also maintain safe operation with birds. The exact make and model of drones selected for the contract has not yet been determined as the project is awaiting the final stages of approval. However one could surmise that while deciding on possible candidates, some considerations would be made on the maximum payload (calculate the total weight of M&Ms and peanut butter, plus fuel), the flight path and maximum range and return flight, before reloading or refueling; especially if the category of sUAS is chosen for this application, then the limit would be 55 pounds.

According to the US FWS, delivery of the vaccine using drones “is potentially the most efficient, effective, cost-conscious and environmentally friendly method of application,” Retrieved from, http://www.uasvision.com/2016/07/19/us-to-deliver-mm-vaccines-to-endangered-ferrets/

Type 2 - small UAV
With regards to the criteria for selecting the right small UAS for the specific application of wildlife vaccination by aerial delivery, there are key factors to consider for choice of Type 2, which are classified by the US military as 21 to 55 lbs.  On paper, by comparing payload size, command and control range, and endurance,  the top choices were the Aerosonde Mark 4.7 by AAI Corporation, the Penguin B and Penguin C by UAV Factory, the Shadow Hawk by Vanguard Defence Industries, and the Scan Eagle by Boeing. However I decided to also include videos of live demonstrations to judge suitability in the target environment - a nature preserve, with forested areas, and open fields.

The Scan Eagle boasts a proven track record of military service with a powerful high speed launcher and an equally impressive skyhook catcher by GPS precision guidance, suited tactical environments with the Allied Forces both on land and at sea. See a Scan Eagle Launch and Recovery Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0r5gG6cngyg Perhaps the launch and recovery alone would be a disturbance to the natural environment, as well he payload is too small 0.9 kg is barely a Costco-size bag of peanut M&M's.

On the other hand, Penguin models may be launched more gracefully from a tripod on the ground or from a moving vehicle, with a more seemingly civilian approach to deploy multiple deliveries of tiny packages to a more delicate target set. Penguin Launch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVZS-w4zKTc The Penguin C offers over 20 hours of continuous flying, onboard video recording, and fuel injected options.  The Penguin B model allows "build your own" payload and autopilot using the given airframe; Penguin C is a more complete package, all-inclusive, "built to suit", ready to fly. (It sounds tempting...)

The Aerosonde has a small footprint, an imagery data link, EO-IR sensors, an automated launch and recovery (mesh net catcher), ideal for maritime operations, and expeditionary military intelligence capabilities.  It is quite graceful in flight, car top or rail launch possible. Aerosonde https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjqsSoKNt4c The cruising speed of 111 km/h alone would be too fast.

The Shadow Hawk seems to have many applications in surveillance, law enforcement, target tracking and acquisition. See the Shadow in Action set to ominous music https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GlLcI6P-rM The payload size of 10kg, control range of 88km and easy manoeverability and target tracking make it an ideal candidate.

Therefore my top choice would be the Shadow Hawk, by Vanguard Defense Industries.
Length 2.184m
Height 0.757m
Maximum takeoff weight 26kg
Max speed 88.5 km/h
Cruising speed 35 km/h
Control range 24 km
Endurance 3h
Payload 10kg



Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Hello Barbie, Hello World

Can you imagine your child talking to a wifi-connected Barbie doll? And the doll talks back? I acknowledge there could be privacy concerns but this is very impressive to have such a capability to capture and record the voice data, retransmit the data, process and analyse the data (children are so complicated), and send a clever reply back in near real time to have a proper conversation.

There are folks hugely concerned with safety and privacy, of just plain electronic interference. How about a doll being too chatty, would be my concern! Toys with too much noise and they dont stop making noise. Where is the off switch! The doll is not available in Canada yet but the CBC news is ranting and raving all about it, more of a bad review.

I like the more balanced view of the reporting on this newest high-tech evolution of a classic toy, from PC Mag. I am game to bring home this new toy for my kid. I will try not to talk to the doll too much, and ask for fashion or relationship advice. I promise!

Image Source

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Dell 2950 Troubleshooting with Dell 32 bit Diagnostic Tool

My buddy says, Help! My server won't boot up, I keep seeing these errors:

The following VD's are missing: 01
and
The battery hardware is missing
The second one is possibly easy to fix, probably the battery drained from being unplugged on the shelf for too long. Plugging in the Dell 2950 without powering up should do the trick, probably abou 24 hours to reach full charge.

VD1 is the RAID 0 virtual drive that is set up across the drives 2,3,4 and 5
VD0 is the RAID 1 mirrored on drives 0 and 1

Were the drives installed in the right bays? yes.
If not, you can recreate this from the RAID Controller GUI

Now the tech has started the proceduce to reconfigure the RAID but the system is not seeing the hardrives 2,3,4,5 anymore.
HOW TO configure RAID on Dell 2950
http://www.thegeekstuff.com/2008/07/step-by-step-guide-to-configure-hardware-raid-on-dell-servers-with-screenshots/
Check if the RAID controller card is functioning.
Swap with another system that is working to verify.

PDF explaining the Dell diagnostic utilities (written by Dell):
http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/power/ps1q05-20040119-Patel-OE.pdf


Downloads page for Dell PowerEdge 2950:
http://www.dell.com/support/troubleshooting/us/en/555/Index


The "Dell 32 Bit Diagnostics" tool (best):http://www.dell.com/support/drivers/us/en/555/DriverDetails?DriverId=Y6D93&FileId=2731107576&DriverName=Dell%2032%20Bit%20Diagnostics%2C%20v.5118A0%2C%205118.3&productCode=poweredge-2950&urlProductCode=Falsehttp://www.dell.com/support/troubleshooting/us/en/555/Indexhttp://www.dell.com/downloads/global/power/ps1q05-20040119-Patel-OE.pdf

HOW TO remotely run the Dell 32 bit Tier 2 Diagnostic over KVM
http://technicalsupportnetwork.org/blog/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=5&blogId=1