Image Source |
1) Upper and lower operating frequencies set the shortest and longest dipole length
2) Number of elements
3) Apex angle of antennae
4) Each successive element is a scaled-down length of its immediate predecessor down the array.
5) The scaling factor τ (tau) derived from a log function.
The longest dipole is 1/4 wavelength of the lowest frequency; the shortest dipole is 1/4 wavelength of the highest frequency. The geometry diagram shows only the top half of the antenna; the bottom half is a mirror image of it. I don't understand why they have to make it a pyramidal design for aesthetics. They must do this to achieve a symetrical RF footprint instead for two lobe pairs instead of just a single side. This article explains in detail how the formulas are used and the magic math involved.
I found an online calculator for the LPA design parameters but I just find it creepy that the page displays your IP address and makes snide comments about the browser you're using. Other than that, it's very accurate, I matched the numbers I punched in with a real Kathrein-Scala dual band wireless antenna spec sheet.
Cross Polarization |
The LPA can be quite small to cover a fairly broad radiation footprint with a reasonable power gain. What's neat is only a part of the array is active at a given frequency. Therefore the antenna can cover a wide frequency band without the need of a switching system. This is good for television reception or as advertised, dual band wireless applications.
To the untrained eye, the Log Periodic Antenna could be confused as a Yagi or have many similarities but I'd say that the LPA is more triangular while a yagi is more rectangular.
Image Source |
No comments:
Post a Comment